BOOTSTRAP STUDIO VS WEBFLOW SOFTWARE
BOOTSTRAP STUDIO VS WEBFLOW CODE
BOOTSTRAP STUDIO VS WEBFLOW PLUS
BOOTSTRAP STUDIO VS WEBFLOW CRACK

I have been using Webflow for all production work for the last year and I have to say it is one of the most amazing and versatile pieces of software on the market.Like Webflow, Bootstrap studio allows you to build without writing a single line of code.

BOOTSTRAP STUDIO VS WEBFLOW CRACK

I don't make many if any posts on here, but when I saw this post I just had to take a crack at it.

BOOTSTRAP STUDIO VS WEBFLOW CODE

But why stop there? Why not continue to use Webflow in a more realistic approach and just use the embed feature to add your custom coded workings? Wouldn't that save a lot more time then exporting to a code editor entirely once you made it to a certain point? Webflow is an amazing tool for anyone who does front-end development, that you can eliminate a lot of your time hand coding and just build it out in Webflow and then export it to finish the rest of your changes. As you mentioned you like how clean the code is and for someone who has done mostly from scratch coding that is great to hear.

BOOTSTRAP STUDIO VS WEBFLOW PLUS

I used to use Muse and BC, plus write some code for UI/UX to get me started, but now with the intro to e-com and Grid there are so many avenues that designers/developers can take away from Webflow. I will come out and say it, I prefer to use Webflow for all of my projects. Great post u/Mike, No you are not missing anything and to answer your question, YES, you should be using apps/sites like Webflow to start your code. Is the long term maintainability of the code base worth the time savings up front? You decide.Īll that being said, it is an amazing tool to quickly build responsive front ends, and I find it saves me lots of time upfront, and my cross browser testing is much smoother. This is a big one for me personally, but I think it just illustrates a bigger point that while it does an amazing job overall, you will sacrifice for the ease of use. This makes the css really unwieldy over time. You can create only element specific styles. The C in css stands for Cascading, which you can’t do in WebFlow.

Modern front end frameworks like react /angular/vue are a necessity for a website of any size, not to mention being able to manage your data structure yourself.Ģ.) if you do have a very basic website, the hosting is pretty expensive.ģ.) No CSS. Since you asked why you shouldn’t use it, here are my reasons.ġ.) it’s not feasible to use Webflow for everything, unless you have a very basic website. So, am I missing anything? Why shouldn't I use apps like Webflow?Įdit: if you’re gonna downvote, I’m interested to hear why. Plus it's way faster if I want to make any changes before exporting, and clients/employer can see a live version to have a more realistic view of the project faster (and before I spend so much time developing).

And the code quality isn't bad at all from what I can tell, especially if you're careful with your element hierarchy and CSS naming structure. What normally would have taken me a week is done in a couple of days. When I'm close to finished, I'll export the code and finish on my local machine– clean up the HTML and CSS a bit to my liking, hook it up with gulp to run tasks, etc.

I've created a few sites in Webflow and did most of the work there and found that my time was reduced dramatically. Complex projects don't have a fast turnaround. The problem is the time that's associated with it. I can create almost anything in a text editor without too much issue. I've been a designer/frontend guy for about 7 years and would consider myself advanced level.

Bootstrap studio vs webflow